One of the main features of photography, just like painting, is the momentariness – the presence in a specific frame of either complete stillness or a single phase of movement. But modern photography is a more flexible tool, offering a multitude of unique possibilities, one of which is the ability to achieve a motion effect within a frame.

If you have decided to buy a photo from a stock bank, you will definitely encounter the need to pay for the photo (illustration) or illustration at the stock bank, along with a decent variety of payment options available.

As I mentioned in previous posts, if you constantly need a large number of high-quality licensed photos or vector images, the best choice for you is to purchase a subscription.

Today, I would like to continue the previously started topic the pros/cons of purchasing images from stock photo agencies and discuss the existing sales models for images, making it easier for buyers to choose the right microstock for their needs.

Undoubtedly, most designers encounter a lack or even an absence of quality materials (photos and illustrations) in their work. About ten to fifteen years ago, this was nearly an insurmountable problem.

A month ago, I came across an article about a lawsuit filed by a Greek man against the Swedish yogurt company Lindahls Mejeri. The reason for the lawsuit is the use of this colorful Greek man’s image on the yogurt packaging.